Home ] Up ] Contents ] Fatigue Paper ] News ] Feedback ]

 

 

[Dividing Line Image]

 Accident Reconstruction and Failure Analysis

This is a brief description of the services available, to you. Each of the following sections is approached in a unique way. The italicized words at the end of each title give a clue as to how each service is presented. For a detailed table listing equipment and issues from previous work experience, refer to the bottom of the Curriculum Vitae in a section titled ACCIDENT RECONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.

Again, this WEB site is for you. Effort has been made to make it interesting and informative and over time, increasingly helpful. If the presentation methods do not meet your needs, please use the FEEDBACK page and provide us with information as to how we can make this WEB site serve your needs or just give us your overall impressions.

Key Benefits

[Bullet] Quality and Customer Orientation
          [Bullet] Human Factors Analysis
[Bullet] Transportation, Traffic and Highway Engineering Specialties
[Bullet] Cost Effective Services and Timely Responses

Capabilities

An accident is an unfortunate event. Each accident is a unique event. Yet there are methods of investigation and analysis common to many of these events. These commonalties, which we know generally and collectively as mathematics and physics, allow the engineer to study and analyze the hard and soft evidence and make determinations about what happened before, during and immediately after the accident event.

GILLENgineering personnel have, over the past 20 years, investigated and analyzed hundreds of accidents involving passenger cars, trucks, motorcycles, trains, bicycles, pedestrians, as well as many unique conveyances such as electric peoplemovers, high-rail rail vehicles, etc. Accident reconstruction activities have included, among others, daytime/nighttime visibility, vehicle handling, lighting, roadway design and markings, signalized intersections, etc.

Through specialized engineering knowledge and skills in surveying and photogrammetry, GILLENgineering personnel have been significantly involved in an even wider range of accident reconstruction activities. Included are catastrophic power plant infrastructure failures, hurricane damage assessment, flooding and residential foundation/basement stability.

These activities require the skilled use of many tools, both computer related and otherwise. GILLENgineering maintains up-to-date software, hardware and equipment to perform detailed assessment and analysis required in the understanding of failures and accidents.

The following descriptions provide you with an introduction to the types of engineering services available at GILLENgineering. For additional information or to discuss your unique failure event, make contact via phone, fax or mail through the Contact Section of the HOME PAGE or by E-mail through the FEEDBACK page.

Traffic Accident Reconstruction: Some Tools

What do you think of when you hear the phrase "traffic accident": two vehicles colliding head on or at an intersection, a car slamming into a tree or pole, multiple vehicles piling up on a foggy mountain pass, a car being struck broadside by a train at a grade crossing? These are the events that make the news headlines. They often involve fatalities or serious injury. The most important thing to understand about such an event is "What caused it." When the collective causation modes of traffic accidents are accurately understood, measures can be taken to reduce both the numbers and severity of traffic accident related deaths, injuries and damages.

 
In addition to the "headliner" type accidents, there are also a myriad of other safety related traffic events which cause damage or injury. Examples include a low-speed collision in a parking lot or where stopped vehicles are queued at a stop light, a bicyclist is knocked down while traversing the edge of a traveled way, a vehicle unexplainably veers off the road. If highway, vehicles and operators are all functioning correctly, these things should not happen. But they do happen, and all too often. Finding out what went wrong and how an accident happened is the job of an accident reconstructionist.

Vehicle Dynamics

At GILLENgineering we use many tools to solve these problems. First and foremost are the basic underpinnings of Newtonian physics dealing with motion and forces. Newton's Laws tell us how things work, at least here on our earth based reference system, as regards mass, force and acceleration. The dynamic events of a traffic accident must subscribe to these laws and through application of the laws and sufficient known information about an accident much can be learned about the events during and leading up to the accident.

We look at the accident dynamics and select the appropriate tools or equations to solve the problem of "How and Why did THIS Accident Happen." In one case it would be appropriate to employ the critical speed formula to determine the minimum speed above which a turning vehicle would break lateral traction and slide off a curve. In another case, flip and vault calculations would be required to calculate the speed of a vehicle at the time it slid sideways into a curb and went airborne. Yet another case would need the use of the fall equation to determine the speed of a vehicle at the time it went airborne, without being tripped. These equations are all derived from the basic fundamental laws of Newtonian physics, and have been adapted for use in accident reconstruction.

To cost-effectively understand the pre-accident conditions, such as speed at initial impact (and the associated Delta-V, or speed at the secondary impact) GILLENgineering utilizes EDCRASH, written and sold by Engineering Dynamics Corporation (EDC), a known and recognized name in the field of accident reconstruction software.

EDCRASH is used to calculate Delta-V from either one, or both, of two sets of inputs: crush data and/or impact and rest locations. The crush data approach compares the actual crush data on the subject vehicle or vehicles to known conditions resulting from crash testing required by NHTSA. Crush stiffness coefficients determined from the crash test vehicles are applied to the subject car for the specific location and amount of the damage measured on the accident vehicle. The Principle Direction of Force (PDOF) and vehicle weight are input along with a set of initial conditions. EDCRASH then calculates the Delta-V, or change in velocity experienced by the occupant compartment portion of the accident vehicle. This is important for the biomechanical analysis of a vehicular accident because Delta-V correlates strongly with the speed of contact of an occupant with the inside surface of a vehicle, thus the speed associated with an occupants injury.

The momentum approach, useful for non-linear collisions (those other than head-on or rear-end collisions), basically solves the dynamic physics of the collision using inputs from the impact and rest locations along with the weights of the vehicles and other information such as the surfaces over which the vehicles traveled from impact to rest.

GILLENgineering obtains the inputs for these analyses from direct inspection of the site of the accident and measurements of the damaged vehicles. During the inspections, documentation via field notes, photographs and/or videotape is made. If the accident site has changed and the necessary physical evidence required to locate the impact and rest locations no longer exists, but photographs taken near the time of the accident are available, photogrammetry is used to accurately reconstruct the required dimensional information. Photogrammetry is also used to measure the amount of crush on an accident vehicle when only images of the vehicle exist, as is often the case when vehicles have been totaled and destroyed.

Numerous other tests and analysis are performed by GILLENgineering to determine HOW and WHY a specific accident happened. The following list highlights some of the more frequently encountered situations.

  • Skidmark Analysis
  • Headlamp Filament Analysis for On/Off Condition
  • Skid Testing of the Road Surface at a Specific Accident Site
  • Visibility Studies for Obstructed Views at Intersections
  • Day and Night Visibility Studies
  • Lighting Condition Visibility Studies
  • Line of Sight Studies for Horizontal and Vertical Curves
  • Driver Reaction Time Analysis
  • Driver Behavior Studies
  • Occupant Restraint Examinations
  • Pavement Marking Analysis
  • Noise Level Analysis
  • Pole Impact Analysis
  • Low-Speed Impact Analysis
  • Vehicle Rollover Analysis
  • Roadway and Traffic Signage Analysis
  • Trailer Disengagement
  • Unintended Acceleration
  • Weather Effects
  • Tire and Wheel Failure Analysis
  • Who Crossed the Centerline Analysis
  • Who Was Driving Analysis

Complementary areas of Accident Reconstruction and Transportation Engineering are described below.

Transportation, Traffic and Highway Engineering: An Overview
 

Vehicle accidents occur within the larger setting of Transportation, Traffic and Highway Engineering. Said another way, it is the overall system of Transportation, Traffic and Highway Engineering from which traffic accidents come forth.

It is often the case that traffic accidents occur as the result of more than one factor. This is true of most failures occurring in the human made world. We are very good at accounting for any single cause of a catastrophe, and avoiding it or minimizing the harmful effects of it. The problem is nature frequently has multiple causes occurring near the same point in time. Some causation events have a bigger impact on the outcome of an accident and others have a lesser impact.

Evaluating accidents in the Transportation, Traffic and Highway Engineering system is really a matter of assessing the known causative elements of the accident event. Accident Reconstruction and Transportation, Traffic and Highway Engineering overlap in the determination of the causative elements.

An accident within our human engineered systems frequently occurs at the confluence of several causes.

Railroad and Railroad Grade Crossing Accident Reconstruction: In Scale

We all know trains are obviously bigger than cars. What is the scale? What physical units should we choose to measured the scale? For analyzing the potential for damage and injury, it is most helpful to look at momentum and energy. The ratio of the momentum of a 2500 pound car traveling 30 mph to a 100,000 pound locomotive traveling 65 mph is 1 to 86. The ratio of the energies for the same two vehicles is 1 to 185. Said another way, a locomotive going 65 mph has 185 times as much energy as a midsize car going 30 mph. These ratios are calculated for a single locomotive engine. Image the ratios if we considered an entire train loaded with coal.

These ratios illustrate why it is so perilous to be in the path of a train. But these situations continue to occur throughout the world. In October of 1995, at a grade crossing in Fox River Grove, Illinois, seven high school children were killed and twenty-four passengers were injured when a commuter train struck a bus. These horrendous loses focused the attention of the nation. In addition to the investigation by the NTSB and others to determine the cause of this accident, a nationwide search was immediately begun to locate other grade crossings where preemption conflicts could possibly exist.

Following the Fox River Grove accident the U. S. Secretary of Transportation mobilized a task force to review the decision-making process for designing, constructing and operating rail crossings. An associated 24-person working group has reviewed the findings of the task force and helped develop a series of recommendations and an action plan. Their report, "Accidents That Shouldn't Happen" was released in March of 1996. The principle finding was that better cooperation, communication and education are necessary among responsible parties if accidents and fatalities are to be reduced at highway-rail grade crossings.

Partially because of the physical ratios given above, at-grade highway-rail grade crossings demand a higher level of safety than is warranted in many other driving situations.

Motorcycle Accident Reconstruction: At Risk

It's exhilarating. It's freedom. It's just you, the road and the machine. I know. I ride. Therefore, I am. Motorcycles are extremely easy to control and perform via a well-defined set of dynamics that are intuitive to the rider. Their ride is mobile and fluid, requires some level of rider interaction and brings the rider close to the elements: the feel of the cool air when dropping down into a small valley or depression at dusk, the smell of fresh cut clover when passing a field, the feel of increased gravity when leaning into a sweeping curve.

But, it is risky transportation, whether for fun, commuting or other activities. A motorcycle rider has the exposure of a pedestrian (there is no occupant compartment to protect the rider) and the velocity of a motor vehicle. Drivers of other vehicles don't always anticipate or look for motorcycles. At the event of some disturbance, either at the road surface or in the environment, two wheels are not as stable as four wheels.

Risks of injury can be minimized by wearing protective clothing, especially a quality, approved, full-face helmet. Risks of accident involvement can be minimized by attending novice and experienced rider training courses offered frequently in many states. As for all driving, it is safer to travel in good weather, on dry roads, at modest speeds and when we are refreshed and have a clear mind focused on driving.

Reconstructing a motorcycle accident is usually challenging, requiring special skills and knowledge on the part of the engineer or reconstructionist. These are obtained through experience, study and training. Broad personal experience as a rider is a necessity for accurately analyzing motorcycle related accidents.

Field Investigation and Documentation: Its Basic
 

Field inspections of accident sites and vehicles are one of the best sources of physical information. To experience the site where an accident happened is vastly more informative than viewing photographs of the same location. Although scene photographs taken when the physical evidence still exists and shows in the photographs are additionally helpful. Such scene photographs can be used to quantify locations, skid marks, debris, vehicle crush and conditions through the use of photogrammetry. Thus they compliment the accident site investigation.

A note on semantics: There is often confusion between the terms accident scene and accident site. The distinction is, the scene is available only immediately following the accident, when the people and/or vehicles are still there. But once the normal everyday activities return to the location, it is henceforth called the accident site.

The most important tool to take to an inspection is an open mind filled with keen, experienced powers of observation. As defined above, accidents often have many contributing causal circumstances. A casual inspection gleaning only the obvious often overlooks important considerations.

But once the observations have been made mentally, it is crucial to document the findings so they can be shown or demonstrated to others. The following is a partial list of tools helpful in this process and routinely employed by GILLENgineering.

  • 35 mm SLR Camera with lenses, filters, tripod, etc. and calibrated for photogrammetry
  • Nikon CoolPix 700 Digital Camera
  • Hi-8 Video Camera with accessories
  • Total Station for Surveying the Accident Site or Vehicle(s)
  • Vericom VC200 Accelerometer for Skid Testing
  • Drag Sled for Skid Testing
  • 25', 100' and 200' Measuring Tapes
  • Rolatape Measuring Wheel, 12" diameter
  • Hand Level
  • Compass
  • Inclinometer
  • Plumb bob
  • Dentist mirror
  • 6" ruler with fine graduations
  • Caliper
  • Impression Compound for collection of surface shapes for microscopic analysis
  • VOX microcassette Voice Recorder
  • Various Chalk and Markers
  • Specimen bags
  • Flashlight
  • Air Pressure Gauge
  • Tread Depth Gauge

Back to Top
Last modified: February 08, 2005